John F. Dalton - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         
          material fact with respect to this collection review matter and             
          that respondent’s Notice of Determination Concerning Collection             
          Actions, upon which this case is based, should be sustained as a            
          matter of law.                                                              
               Summary judgment is intended to expedite litigation and                
          avoid unnecessary and expensive trials.  Fla. Peach Corp. v.                
          Commissioner, 90 T.C. 678, 681 (1988).  Summary judgment may be             
          granted with respect to all or any part of the legal issues in              
          controversy “if the pleadings, answers to interrogatories,                  
          depositions, admissions, and any other acceptable materials,                
          together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no                 
          genuine issue as to any material fact and that a decision may be            
          rendered as a matter of law.”  Rule 121(a) and (b); Sundstrand              
          Corp. v. Commissioner, 98 T.C. 518, 520 (1992), affd. 17 F.3d 965           
          (7th Cir. 1994); Zaentz v. Commissioner, 90 T.C. 753, 754 (1988);           
          Naftel v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 527, 529 (1985).  The moving                
          party bears the burden of proving that there is no genuine issue            
          of material fact, and factual inferences will be read in a manner           
          most favorable to the party opposing summary judgment.  Dahlstrom           
          v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 812, 821 (1985); Jacklin v.                        
          Commissioner, 79 T.C. 340, 344 (1982).                                      
               As explained in detail below, there is no genuine issue as             
          to any material fact in this case and a decision may be rendered            








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011