John F. Dalton - Page 4

                                        - 4 -                                         
          failed to report $9,587 of wages received from American                     
          Protective, $4,523 of wages received from Smith Security Corp.,             
          $6,191 of a taxable distribution from John Hancock, $925 of a               
          taxable distribution received from BT Svcs. Tenn., $18 of                   
          interest received from NBD Bank, and $843 of Social Security                
          payments.                                                                   
               By separate letters to respondent dated February 20, 2001,             
          petitioner acknowledged receiving the deficiency notices and                
          questioned respondent’s authority to issue these notices.                   
          Petitioner did not file a petition for redetermination with the             
          Court contesting the deficiency notices, however.                           
               Respondent mailed to petitioner a Final Notice - Notice of             
          Intent to Levy and Notice of Your Right to a Hearing Under                  
          Section 6330 (final notice) on July 12, 2002, with regard to                
          petitioner’s unpaid Federal income taxes for 1998 and 1999.  A              
          schedule attached to the final notice stated that petitioner owed           
          an assessed balance of $717.45 plus statutory additions of $69.95           
          for 1998 and an assessed balance of $3,402.77 for 1999.                     
               Petitioner timely filed with respondent a Request for a                
          Collection Due Process Hearing, which included frivolous                    
          allegations that the proposed levy should be barred for several             
          reasons.  First, petitioner alleged that respondent purportedly             
          failed to issue to petitioner “valid” notices of deficiency                 
          because the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) does not have the                






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011