- 19 - Overall, we do not find the segregation of the dealership’s classic cars relevant to our determination whether they were for investment or for sale. We therefore find this factor neutral. 5. Purpose of Acquisition This factor relates to whether the taxpayer intended to hold the property for sale or to hold the property for investment. Williford v. Commissioner, supra. Respondent argues that the dealership’s application for “exhibition” license plates indicates that the dealership did not hold the classic cars for sale. Instead, respondent argues that the exhibition plates essentially meant the classic cars were not for sale. As petitioner countered, the exhibition plates did not restrict the cars from being sold but merely were a means of informing the public that the classic cars were at least 25 years old. Respondent also argues that the dealership acquired the classic cars to hold them for investment because Mr. Taylor was “passionate” about cars in general and classic cars in particular. Testimony established that every classic car the dealership owned was acquired so it could be sold for a profit. We do not find it relevant whether Mr. Taylor was passionate about classic cars. The dealership’s accounting treatment of the classic cars was no different from the new or used cars. Each car, whether new, used, or classic, was assigned a stock inventory number.Page: Previous 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011