- 25 -
Respondent had the burden to prove by a preponderance of the
evidence that the classic cars were not held for sale. He did
not meet that burden. We conclude that the dealership’s classic
cars were held for sale and hence qualify for an exception from
capital asset status under section 1221(a)(1). Accordingly, we
do not sustain respondent’s determination.
Decision will be entered
for petitioner.
Page: Previous 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Last modified: May 25, 2011