Joseph A. and Sari F. Deihl - Page 44

                                       - 44 -                                         
               More than $11,000 was reported as paid to Aramark Sports &             
          Entertainment in June of 1998, but no invoices or bills are                 
          contained in the record.  The sole testimony regarding these                
          amounts was the following statement by Mrs. Deihl:  “I believe              
          those are entertainers that we hired because we used to for the             
          conventions and different events that went on we would hire                 
          dancers and magicians and all sort of entertainers.”  Similarly,            
          Mrs. Deihl testified as to payments to Arizona Arts Chorale in              
          March of 1997 deducted by KareMor:  “Arizona Arts Chorale I                 
          believe is a local chorus or singing group”, which was hired to             
          “Entertain distributors” for business events.  While the Court              
          has little doubt that petitioners did employ various entertainers           
          in conjunction with business functions, this generalized                    
          testimony is insufficient to establish the deductibility of any             
          particular outlay for purposes of either section 162 or section             
          274.                                                                        
               A like problem exists with respect to payments to Affairs              
          Unlimited in the amount of $6,000 made in September of 1997 and             
          deducted by KareMor and in the amount of $11,372.56 made in                 
          November of 1997 and deducted by Mayor.  The sole explanation in            
          the record is:  “They’re a staging company.  They set up sets and           
          decor for parties.”  The Court was not provided with evidence or            
          facts about the nature of any specific “parties” that would                 
          support deductibility of these items.                                       






Page:  Previous  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011