- 49 - far greater stretch. Hence, these amounts would appear to be business gifts subject to the strictures of section 274 and not substantiated as required therein. With respect to purchases made at Neiman Marcus, Mr. Deihl testified: “we purchased items there and gifts for all the advisory boards and for the Crowns at all the conventions and things of that nature. We also purchased the--some Christmas gifts for the employees from Neiman Marcus every year.” He offered additional details in the following colloquy on direct examination: Q For what purpose did you use Neiman Marcus, what kinds of purchases? A Well, it would be three separate things. One would be gifts from their gift gallery to the individuals. Q Stop there. Gift from their gift gallery to be used as gifts or to be used as rewards? A To be used as, the purchase could be either one, for rewards or gifts. I cannot determine what that is from there. But they also supplied some of the gowns for the ladies in question that would come from Neiman Marcus also. Q To your knowledge any personal expenditures? I should say expenditures in Neiman Marcus for personal use? Without looking at the documents, just a general question, Mr. Deihl, just a general question. A Well, most of the time when we did things at Neiman Marcus on behalf of the company we used the company’s credit card, an American Express card. In private uses we’d use our Neiman Marcus charge card which is a separate structure entirely.Page: Previous 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011