Estate of Frazier Jelke III, Deceased, Wachovia Bank, N.A., f.k.a. First Union National Bank, Personal Representative - Page 11

                                       - 11 -                                         
          determined by considering the price at which the property would             
          change hands between a willing buyer and a willing seller,                  
          neither being under any compulsion to buy or to sell, and both              
          having reasonable knowledge of relevant facts.  Sec. 20.2031-               
          1(b), Estate Tax Regs.  The determination of the fair market                
          value of property is a factual determination, and the trier of              
          fact must weigh all relevant evidence of value and draw                     
          appropriate inferences.  Helvering v. Natl. Grocery Co., 304 U.S.           
          282, 294 (1938); Symington v. Commissioner, 87 T.C. 892, 896                
          (1986); sec. 20.2031-1(b), Estate Tax Regs.                                 
               The determination of the fair market value of a closely held           
          (unlisted) stock may be effectively established by reference to             
          arm’s-length sales of the same stock within a reasonable time               
          before or after the valuation date.  See, e.g., Ward v.                     
          Commissioner, 87 T.C. 78, 101 (1986).  Absent an arm’s-length               
          sale, fair market value is normally determined using the                    
          hypothetical willing buyer and seller model.  Estate of Hall v.             
          Commissioner, 92 T.C. 312, 335-336 (1989).  Implicit in that                
          model is the axiom that the seller would attempt to maximize                
          profit and the buyer to minimize cost.  Estate of Curry v. United           
          States, 706 F.2d 1424, 1429 (7th Cir. 1983); Estate of Newhouse             
          v. Commissioner, 94 T.C. 193 (1990).                                        









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011