Deborah Y. and Donald J. Everhart - Page 3

                                        - 2 -                                         
               Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioners’ Federal             
          income tax of $12,120 and an accuracy-related penalty in the                
          amount of $2,424 pursuant to section 6662(a) for the taxable year           
          2000.                                                                       
               After a concession by petitioners,1 the issues for decision            
          are:  (1) Whether petitioners failed to report income, received             
          by petitioner Donald J. Everhart, from Ronald Muhammad for                  
          contracting work; and (2) whether petitioners are liable for an             
          accuracy-related penalty in the amount of $2,424 pursuant to                
          section 6662(a) for the taxable year 2000.                                  
                                     Background                                       
               Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.               
          The stipulation of facts and the attached exhibits are                      
          incorporated herein by this reference.  Petitioners resided in              
          Chicago, Illinois, on the date the petition was filed in this               
          case.                                                                       
               Petitioners timely filed a Federal joint income tax return             
          for the taxable year 2000.  During taxable year 2000, Donald J.             
          Everhart (petitioner) was a contractor licensed by the city of              
          Chicago.  Petitioner was retained in that capacity by Ronald                
          Muhammad (Mr. Muhammad) to perform construction services at                 
          rental property owned by Mr. Muhammad.                                      



          1Petitioners conceded that they failed to include in gross                  
          income for taxable year 2000, $28 of interest income.                       




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011