Deborah Y. and Donald J. Everhart - Page 9

                                        - 8 -                                         
          Court has consistently given this definition of gross income a              
          liberal construction “in recognition of the intention of Congress           
          to tax all gains except those specifically exempted.”                       
          Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co., 348 U.S. 426, 430 (1955); see           
          also Roemer v. Commissioner, 716 F.2d 693, 696 (9th Cir. 1983),             
          (all realized accessions to wealth are presumed taxable income,             
          unless the taxpayer can demonstrate that an acquisition is                  
          specifically exempted from taxation), revg. 79 T.C. 398 (1982).             
               However, pursuant to section 162, a taxpayer may deduct                
          ordinary and necessary expenses paid or incurred during the                 
          taxable year in carrying on his or her trade or business.  A                
          taxpayer is engaged in a trade or business if the taxpayer is               
          involved in the activity (1) with continuity and regularity, and            
          (2) with the primary purpose of making a profit.  Commissioner v.           
          Groetzinger, 480 U.S. 23, 35 (1987); Antonides v. Commissioner,             
          893 F.2d 656, 659 (4th Cir. 1990), affg. 91 T.C. 686 (1988).                
               Petitioner has the burden of proving that he was engaged in            
          a trade or business and, as stated previously, that the deposits            
          made to his account, checks cashed, and checks written on his               
          account, were not includable in his 2000 income as determined by            
          respondent.  Rule 142(a); INDOPCO, Inc. v. Commissioner, 503 U.S.           
          79, 84 (1992); New Colonial Ice Co. v. Helvering, 292 U.S. 435,             
          440 (1934); Welch v. Helvering, supra.                                      







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011