- 29 -                                         
          multiple deductions of the same amounts is inconsistent with his            
          spreadsheets, which show that he entered the same amounts more              
          than once on his spreadsheets.                                              
                    d.   Failure To Cooperate With Tax Authorities                    
               A taxpayer’s failure to cooperate with the Commissioner’s              
          examining agents is a badge of fraud.  Bradford v. Commissioner,            
          supra.  Petitioners did not meet with Hughs as she requested or             
          provide the substantiation she requested.  We conclude that                 
          petitioners did not cooperate with Hughs.                                   
                    e.    Having False or Inadequate Books and Records                
               A taxpayer’s failure to maintain accurate records or                   
          concealment of records may be a badge of fraud.  Id. at 308;                
          Merritt v. Commissioner, 301 F.2d 484, 487 (5th Cir. 1962), affg.           
          T.C. Memo. 1959-172; Reaves v. Commissioner, 295 F.2d 336, 338              
          (5th Cir. 1961), affg. 31 T.C. 690 (1958); Grosshandler v.                  
          Commissioner, supra.  As discussed above, petitioners failed to             
          produce, and thus we infer that they failed to keep, records                
          substantiating their deductions.                                            
               3.   Whether Petitioner’s Deduction of $16,500 TruGreen Paid           
                    to Nelson Hesse or $471.45 Paid to an Individual Not              
                    Otherwise Identified in the Record Was Fraudulent                 
               Respondent contends that petitioner’s deductions for 2000 of           
          $16,500 paid to Nelson Hesse for legal and professional services            
          and $471.45 paid to an individual not otherwise identified in the           
          record were fraudulent for the same reasons that his deductions             
Page:  Previous   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   NextLast modified: May 25, 2011