Helen E. Foy - Page 37

                                       - 37 -                                         
              5.   Conclusion                                                         
              To summarize, we award petitioner the following attorney’s              
         fees and costs:27                                                            
                                   Time     Hourly                                    
               Attorney/Item        expended    rate    Total cost                    
               Wendy Pearson       8.8 hours  $150     $1,320.00                      
               Terri Merriam       2.9 hours   150          435.00                    
               Jennifer Gellner       10.5 hours   150      1,575.00                  
               Jennifer Gellner        2.1 hours   110      231.00                    
               Costs                    --          --      1,350.34                  
               Share of group fees                                                    
               and costs1          --             --         5,879.17                 
                    Total fees and costs awarded            10,790.51                 
              1Petitioner’s award for her Share of Group Fees and Costs               
         includes $3,577.22 (share of fees from litigation group of Hoyt              
         investors), and $2,301.95 (share of fees from general group of               
         Hoyt investors).                                                             
         C.   Conclusion                                                              
              We have carefully considered all remaining arguments made by            
         the parties for results contrary to those expressed herein, and,             
         to the extent not discussed above, we find those arguments to be             
         irrelevant, moot, or without merit.                                          




               27Respondent does not contend that the fees and costs at               
          issue here must be traced and allocated to the various positions            
          taken by the parties under sec. 6015, nor does he contend that              
          his positions under sec. 6015(b) and (f) were substantially                 
          justified.  Moreover, respondent’s failure to timely and properly           
          evaluate petitioner’s sec. 6015(c) argument, in our view, was               
          responsible for the legal work expended on arguments for relief             
          under sec. 6015(b) and (f).  Consequently, we have not attempted            
          to allocate the fees and costs to the various arguments made by             
          the parties under sec. 6015.                                                




Page:  Previous  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011