Gregg R. and Teresa M. Gilbert - Page 8

                                        - 7 -                                         
          1985.  Per the contractual agreements between petitioner and                
          Conseco, if the Marketing Agreement were terminated after 5 years           
          or more, then petitioner would be vested and would receive 100%             
          of the renewal policy commissions based on the applicable                   
          percentages laid out in the Marketing Agreement and amendments.             
          All commissions remain vested in petitioner until petitioner’s              
          “cash premiums as collected” fall below $8,000 for a consecutive            
          12-month period.  At the time of trial, petitioner was still                
          receiving commission compensation from renewal policies with                
          Conseco.                                                                    
               An accident suffered by petitioner in 1999 caused him to               
          retire on Social Security disability.  Petitioner was effectively           
          terminated from his position with Conseco in January 1999                   
          following this disabling accident.  Petitioner ceased to be a               
          “manager of record” on any account after January 1999.                      
          Petitioner’s Marketing Agreement with Conseco was officially                
          terminated effective October 13, 2000.  Petitioner did not sign a           
          separate termination agreement.                                             
               Prior to termination, petitioner would receive additional              
          renewal commission payments if one of his client’s policy                   
          payments increased due to amendments or other economic changes.             
          However, after termination of his employment with Conseco,                  
          petitioner did not get the benefit of the increase in these                 
          policy payments.  Instead, after termination of petitioner’s                






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011