Elizabeth Giles - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         
                       MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION                        

               LARO, Judge:  Petitioner petitioned the Court to redetermine           
          deficiencies of $7,191 and $6,040 in her 1997 and 1998 Federal              
          income taxes.  Following petitioner’s concession as to a                    
          procedural matter concerning the notice of deficiency, we are               
          left to decide as to those years whether petitioner’s activity of           
          breeding and showing horses (horse activity) was an “activity not           
          engaged in for profit” under section 183.2  We hold it was.                 
          Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to the                   
          applicable versions of the Internal Revenue Code, and Rule                  
          references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.            
                                  FINDINGS OF FACT                                    
          I.  Background                                                              
               Some facts were stipulated.  We incorporate herein by this             
          reference the parties’ stipulation of facts and the exhibits                
          submitted therewith.3  Petitioner resided at 18500 Falling Water            
          Way, Riverside, California (Falling Water Way property), when her           




               2 As discussed herein, petitioner showed her horses at                 
          various competitions.  The parties use the term “showing”                   
          interchangeably with the term “competing”, and so do we.                    
               3 In addition to the stipulations, petitioner’s opening                
          brief asks the Court to take “judicial notice” of documents that            
          were filed in this case and statements made in prior Opinions of            
          this Court.  We give those documents and statements proper                  
          consideration without regard to “judicial notice” as that term is           
          used in Fed. R. Evid. 201.                                                  




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011