- 4 - (A) In general.--Distributions which are-- * * * * * * * (iii) attributable to the employee’s being disabled within the meaning of subsection (m)(7) * * *. Section 72(m)(7) provides: (7) Meaning of disabled.--For purposes of this section, an individual shall be considered to be disabled if he is unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or to be of long-continued and indefinate duration. An individual shall not be considered to be disabled unless he furnishes proof of the existence thereof in such form and manner as the Secretary may require. The regulations provide, inter alia, that to be considered disabled a person is unable to engage in any “substantial gainful activity”. Substantial gainful activity means the activity, or a comparable activity, in which the individual customarily engaged prior to the disability. Sec. 1.72-17(f)(1), Income Tax Regs. Petitioners agree that there was a distribution during the taxable year 2001 and that the distribution was taxable. The question solely concerns whether the section 72(t) additional tax applies. Petitioners maintain that petitioner was disabled within the meaning of section 72(m)(7) during the year of the distribution. This is somewhat peculiar since petitioner, during the entire 2001 year, was paid a $93,165 salary for his employment with IT. Furthermore, the reports from his doctors provide that, while hePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011