Dianne M. and Charles H. Headen - Page 3

                                        - 2 -                                         
               Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioners’ 2000                
          Federal income tax in the amount of $2,213.  The issue for                  
          consideration is whether Social Security disability benefits                
          received in 2000 by Charles H. Headen are includable in                     
          petitioners’ income for that year.                                          
          Background                                                                  
               Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.  At           
          the time the petition was filed in this case, petitioners resided           
          in Ocala, Florida.  References to petitioner are to Charles                 
          Headen.1                                                                    
               In 1984, petitioner was injured in the line of duty as a               
          Florida highway patrol officer.  As a result of his injuries,               
          petitioner underwent three surgeries and was out of work for                
          extended lengths of time from 1984 to 1993.  During these                   
          absences, petitioner collected worker’s compensation benefits.              
               In 1993, petitioner’s physician determined that petitioner             
          was “totally and permanently disabled from gainful employment”              
          and “incapable of any kind of work”.  As a result of his                    
          disability, petitioner was awarded “in line of duty” disability             
          retirement benefits from the State of Florida.  In addition to              



               1  Dianne M. Headen neither appeared at trial nor signed the           
          stipulation of facts.  The case will be dismissed as to her for             
          lack of prosecution.  Rule 123(b).  However, the decision will be           
          entered against petitioner Dianne M. Headen consistent with the             
          decision entered against petitioner Charles H. Headen.                      




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011