- 4 - petitioner did not provide a date of payment; (2) stated that all requirements of law and administrative procedure had been satisfied and that the need for efficient collection had been properly balanced against any legitimate concerns raised by petitioner; (3) sustained the proposed levy and the filing of a Federal tax lien; and (4) warned petitioner that if he continued to raise frivolous arguments, he could be subjected to a penalty under section 6673(a). In response to the notice of determination, petitioner filed his petition with the Court on April 12, 2004. OPINION Pursuant to section 6330(d)(1), within 30 days of the issuance of a notice of determination, a taxpayer may appeal the determination to this Court if we have jurisdiction over the underlying tax liability. Where the validity of the underlying tax liability is properly at issue, the Court will review the matter de novo. Sego v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. 604, 610 (2000); Goza v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. 176, 181 (2000). Where the validity of the underlying tax liability is not properly at issue, however, the Court will review the Commissioner’s determination for abuse of discretion. Sego v. Commissioner, supra at 610; Goza v. Commissioner, supra at 181. 3(...continued) and we address it in due course.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011