- 9 - 1111, 1119-1122 (1983); Tolotti v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002- 86, affd. 70 Fed. Appx. 971 (9th Cir. 2003). We find that respondent did not abuse his discretion in denying petitioner’s collection alternative. In the notice of determination, respondent verified that all requirements of applicable law and administrative procedure had been met and that respondent properly balanced the need for efficient collection against any legitimate concerns raised by petitioner. Petitioner has not presented any evidence or persuasive arguments to convince us that respondent abused his discretion but instead has only advanced frivolous tax protester- type arguments. As a result, we hold respondent’s determination was not an abuse of discretion, and respondent may proceed with the proposed methods of collection. Section 6673(a)(1) authorizes the Court to require a taxpayer to pay the United States a penalty in an amount not to exceed $25,000 whenever it appears to the Court the taxpayer’s position in such a proceeding is frivolous or groundless. Sec. 6673(a)(1)(B). Respondent has not asked the Court to impose a penalty under section 6673(a) against petitioner. However, the Court may, sua sponte, impose this penalty. Pierson v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. 576, 580 (2000); Rewerts v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2004-248; Jensen v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2004-120. Petitioner has previously been a litigant in this Court. InPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011