Hubert Enterprises, Inc. and Subsidiaries, et al. - Page 23

                                        -23-                                          
          following amounts of lease income, interest expense,                        
          depreciation, and income/(loss):                                            
               1995           1996         1997         1998                          
          Lease income               -0-       $1,157,816   $1,646,796   $1,341,589   
          Interest expense       ($150,412)      (433,423)    (490,523)    (285,889)  
          Depreciation          (1,364,400)    (2,183,040)  (1,309,824)    (589,467)  
          Income/(loss)         (1,514,812)    (1,458,647)    (153,551)     466,233   
               C.  1998 Amtel Equipment                                               
               Amtel Corp. (Amtel) and Third Street Services, Inc. (TSS),             
          are corporations that are unaffiliated with any Hubert company.             
          On April 30, 1998, CRG purchased from Starwood for $8,927,204.90            
          a 60.55-percent interest (60.55-percent interest) in certain                
          equipment (1998 Amtel equipment) leased by TSS to Amtel.                    
          Pursuant to promissory notes dated April 30, 1998, CRG agreed to            
          pay Starwood $8,222,860.90 and $235,000.  Also on April 30, 1998,           
          CRG leased the 60.55-percent interest back to Starwood for an               
          86-month term beginning August 1, 1998.                                     
               Also on April 30, 1998, LCL purchased the 60.55-percent                
          interest (subject to the lease) from CRG for $8,927,204.90.                 
          Pursuant to promissory notes dated April 30, 1998, LCL agreed to            
          pay CRG $8,172,204.90 and $235,000.  No individual member of LCL            
          signed or directly guaranteed these promissory notes, the first             
          of which stated it was recourse to the extent of $4.75 million              
          and that payments of principal and interest would be applied to             
          the recourse portion before the nonrecourse portion.  The second            
          note stated it was nonrecourse.                                             






Page:  Previous  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011