- 4 - territory. The agreement set petitioner’s compensation on a commission schedule based on the business category for the products that he sold.4 In addition, Manulife provided petitioner with an annual reimbursement allocation, which petitioner could use for any business-related expense.5 Petitioner, however, was responsible for business expenses exceeding his reimbursement allocation. Manulife did not pay petitioner for vacation days, but Manulife provided that petitioner was eligible to enroll in its benefit and retirement plans. Petitioner’s responsibilities were to identify sales opportunities for insurance agents, brokers, financial planners, and stockbrokers and to provide financial plans for their clients. As the regional director, petitioner reported his goals and objectives to the western regional manager. In his sales presentations, petitioner used financial planning information packets that were preapproved by Manulife.6 Petitioner’s only office location was the Irvine office. Petitioner purchased his 4 Although not further explained in the record, it appears that petitioner received an annual base salary of $60,000 for old sales commissions as evidenced in his 1999 monthly compensation statements. 5 The record does not disclose the amount of petitioner’s reimbursement allocation, nor does it explain Manulife’s reimbursement procedures. 6 For 1999, petitioner led the company in sales for life insurance products.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011