Duane E. Hudspath - Page 14

                                        -14-                                          
               an installment agreement for $130.00/month, payable on                 
               the 26th of each month.  The taxpayer understands that                 
               interest will continue to accrue on the balances owed                  
               until the amounts are paid in full.  The taxpayer also                 
               understands that a Notice of Federal Tax Lien may be                   
               filed if the agreement defaults.  The taxpayer verbally                
               agreed to these terms, and was provided Form 433D,                     
               Installment Agreement for review.  However, the tax-                   
               payer still desired an in-office conference to be                      
               recorded via court stenographer.                                       
               An in-office conference, audio taped by Appeals, as                    
               well as recorded via court stenographer, was held on                   
               December 18, 2003 at 10:30 a.m.  At this conference,                   
               the taxpayer supplied the signed Form 433D, Installment                
               Agreement, agreeing to the terms as detailed above.  He                
               also provided his first installment payment as well as                 
               the one-time user fee of $43.00.  He was provided with                 
               the opportunity to raise any and all other issues of                   
               concern to him.  Again, the underlying liability issue                 
               was raised, and the IRS’ position, as stipulated in the                
               Decision document from Hudspath v. Commissioner (U.S.                  
               Tax Court Docket No. 7901-00), was reiterated to the                   
               taxpayer.                                                              
               The taxpayer again acknowledged receiving IRS                          
               worksheets, but did not realize that he could have                     
               disputed the amounts as determined by the IRS.  The                    
               taxpayer was advised during the Appeals conference that                
               if he possessed substantive information that would                     
               change the actual amounts of the computations (i.e.                    
               proof of a math error made on the part of the IRS,                     
               etc.), that he could potentially pursue a request for                  
               abatement.  Mr. Hudspath advised he possessed no such                  
               information.  He does not believe there should be any                  
               assessments at all.                                                    
               The taxpayer advised that he would be petitioning Tax                  
               Court to challenge the underlying liability even fur-                  
               ther.  However, he would not be raising the issue of                   
               achieving a collection alternative, because he is in                   
               agreement with the terms of his signed Form 433D.                      
                           BRIEF BACKGROUND OF ASSESSMENT                             
               The outstanding liabilities for 1996 and 1997 are the                  
               result of TEFRA flow-through adjustments from two TEFRA                
               entities:  WINN [sic] ENTERPRISES, LC., and STEPHENS                   





Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011