- 6 - Petitioners timely filed their joint Federal income tax return for taxable year 2000, on April 14, 2001. On their Form 1040, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, petitioners did not report the amount of $9,481 received from the Fortis Co. in their gross income. Petitioners attached a Form 8275, Disclosure Statement, to their Form 1040. On the Form 8275, the petitioners’ tax return preparer wrote: W-2 issued by Fortis Insurance Co. indicates taxable income of $9,481 the taxpayer presents that the income is comprised of disability payments not subject to tax and that the W-2 was issued with the income coded incorrectly. The taxpayer is attempting to resolve the issue with Fortis Insurance Co. at the time. Respondent issued petitioners a notice of deficiency for taxable year 2000, in which respondent determined that petitioners had unreported income of $9,481 and that they were liable for a tax deficiency in the amount of $1,425. Discussion1 Section 61(a) defines gross income as “all income from whatever source derived,” unless otherwise provided. McClanahan v. United States, 292 F.2d 630, 631-632 (5th Cir. 1961). The Supreme Court has consistently given this definition of gross income a liberal construction “in recognition of the intention of Congress to tax all gains except those specifically exempted.” 1We decide the issue in this case without regard to the burden of proof. Accordingly, we need not decide whether the general rule of sec. 7491(a)(1) is applicable in this case. See Higbee v. Commissioner, 116 T.C. 438 (2001).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011