K & M La Botica Pharmacy, Incorporated, et al. - Page 29

                                       - 29 -                                         
               As indicated, for 1997 and 1998 respondent determined that             
          the nominee entities, including K & M, constituted mere nominees            
          of Ahmed personally, and respondent collapsed the nominee                   
          entities into the calculation of Ahmed’s taxable income and                 
          Federal income tax for those years.  On the notice of deficiency            
          mailed to Ahmed for 1997 and 1998, respondent (after disallowing            
          many claimed expenses) charged Ahmed with all items of income and           
          all items of expense that respondent determined were allowable              
          relating to the nominee entities.                                           
               Respondent determined that the civil fraud penalty under               
          section 6663 was applicable to Ahmed for 1995, 1996, and 1997 and           
          to K & M for 1995 and 1996.  Respondent also determined that the            
          fraudulent failure to file penalty under section 6651(f) was                
          applicable to Ahmed for 1998 (because, as explained, Ahmed’s 1998           
          Federal income tax return was not filed with respondent until               
          after respondent’s notice of deficiency to Ahmed for 1998 had               
          been issued).                                                               

          Jeopardy Proceeding                                                         
               On March 19, 1999, Ahmed cashed a $770,000 check drawn on a            
          K & M bank account and used the proceeds to purchase a $770,000             
          cashier’s check payable to himself.                                         
               On June 24, 1999, for 1995, 1996, and 1997, and on July 22,            
          1999, for 1998, respondent made jeopardy assessments against                







Page:  Previous  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011