K & M La Botica Pharmacy, Incorporated, et al. - Page 30

                                       - 30 -                                         
          Ahmed in the cumulative total amount of $1,426,038 relating to              
          Ahmed’s Federal income tax for the same years involved herein               
          (namely, 1995, 1996, 1997, and 1998).                                       
               Ahmed challenged respondent’s above jeopardy assessments in            
          the Federal District Court for the Central District of                      
          California.  In preparation for the court hearing relating to the           
          jeopardy assessments, Ahmed had a document prepared by his                  
          attorney entitled “Declaration of Ahmad Saghir”.  Ahmed offered             
          Saghir $3,000 and pressured Saghir to sign the declaration.                 
          Although Saghir felt threatened by Ahmed, Saghir did not sign the           
          declaration because it contained false statements.                          
               On August 18, 1999, the District Court sustained                       
          respondent’s above jeopardy assessments on the ground that Ahmed            
          appeared to be designing to place property and assets beyond the            
          reach of the United States.                                                 

          Stipulation as to Income and Expenses                                       
               As to 1995, 1996, 1997, and 1998, the parties have                     
          stipulated to the income and to the allowance or disallowance of            
          all of the expenses claimed on Ahmed’s and on the nominee entity            
          Federal income tax returns as filed.                                        
               Also, as indicated, as to 1997 and 1998, the parties have              
          stipulated to the collapsed treatment of Ahmed’s nominee                    
          entities, i.e., that the stipulated income and the stipulated               
          allowable expenses of the nominee entities are to be charged to             





Page:  Previous  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011