- 3 - reference. At the time of filing the petition, petitioner resided in Los Angeles, California. Background Petitioner did not file a Federal income tax return for 1997.2 On November 1, 2001, respondent issued to petitioner a notice of deficiency in which respondent determined a deficiency and additions to tax for petitioner’s 1997 tax year. Respondent’s determination was based on information returns received from third-party payors. The following amounts were reported as paid to petitioner in 1997: Payor Type of Payment Amount Paid Compton Unified School District Wages $27,325 Merrill Lynch et al. Stocks/bonds sale 2 Merrill Lynch et al. Stocks/bonds sale 17 Merrill Lynch et al. Stocks/bonds sale 19 Merrill Lynch et al. Stocks/bonds sale 401 Merrill Lynch et al. Stocks/bonds sale 694 Merrill Lynch et al. Dividends (ordinary) 22 Wells Fargo Bank Interest 16 American Network NEC income (nonemployee Ins. Co. compensation) 31 Mitchell Energy Corp. Royalties 7,220 R.W. Durham NEC income (nonemployee compensation) 1,427 Petitioner does not dispute receiving the payments reflected above. With respect to the various proceeds from stock and bonds sales reported by Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 2 Petitioner mailed to respondent a Federal income tax return for 1997 on May 18, 2004, one day before the date of his trial. A copy of the return was admitted at trial solely for the purpose of assisting petitioner in developing his arguments and claims for various deductions.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011