Vittorio Kellum - Page 17

                                       - 16 -                                         
          payments in 1997.  As such, respondent has satisfied his initial            
          burden of production to show that the section 6654(a) addition to           
          tax is appropriate.  The burden of proof, including the burden to           
          establish the applicability of any exceptions, remains on                   
          petitioner.  See Higbee v. Commissioner, supra at 446; Spurlock             
          v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2003-248.  Petitioner has not shown             
          that any of the statutory exceptions are applicable.  The section           
          6654(e)(1) exception does not apply because petitioner’s tax for            
          1997 is greater than $500.  The section 6654(e)(2) exception does           
          not appear to apply because his tax liability for 1996 was not              
          zero, as the record shows that petitioner earned wage income in             
          1996.                                                                       
               Respondent’s determination in regard to the section 6654(a)            
          addition to tax is sustained.                                               
               Reviewed and adopted as the report of the Small Tax Case               
          Division.                                                                   
               To reflect the foregoing,                                              

                                                  Decision will be                    
                                             entered under Rule 155.                  













Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  

Last modified: May 25, 2011