Winston Knauss - Page 6

                                        - 6 -                                         
          conceded an additional $1,000 in selling expenses for lead                  
          ballast installation, resulting in unreported gain of $155,848.             
               Sir Winston                                                            
               On December 15, 1992, petitioner entered into a contract               
          with Darling Yachts, Inc., to construct a yacht to his                      
          specifications for $623,706.  The contract provided for an offset           
          to the contract price for any item supplied by petitioner that              
          Darling Yachts, Inc., was obligated to provide under the                    
          contract.  Petitioner supplied a $2,395 radar system and $18,433            
          in carpeting that Darling Yachts, Inc., was obligated to provide.           
          Petitioner also paid $49,220 for architectural fees, galley                 
          equipment, blinds and wallpaper, miscellaneous electronics, life            
          jackets, and a security system for the yacht that were not                  
          required to be provided by Darling Yachts, Inc.                             
               Darling Yachts, Inc., did not complete the vessel by the               
          December 15, 1993, completion deadline specified on the contract.           
          When it had still not been completed approximately 12 months                
          later, petitioner took possession on December 6, 1994, and                  
          undertook the completion work himself.  Immediately prior to                
          petitioner’s taking possession, a marine survey report5 on the              


               5 The parties’ stipulation covering this report states that            
          the survey was conducted on Nov. 3, 1994.  However, the report              
          itself is a stipulated exhibit and states that the survey was               
          conducted on Dec. 3, 1994.  We therefore conclude that the                  
          stipulation is erroneous and that the survey date was Dec. 3,               
          1994.                                                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011