Winston Knauss - Page 9

                                        - 9 -                                         
          on those accounts that could have been for capital improvements             
          to the Sir Winston did not exceed $79,347.  During this period,             
          petitioner also had two credit cards through which he made                  
          expenditures totaling $54,589.                                              
               Petitioner sold the Sir Winston II to Dream Boat, Inc., for            
          $2 million on April 7, 1997.  Petitioner advised his return                 
          preparer, and reported on his 1997 return, that his basis in the            
          Sir Winston II was $1,789,322.  Adjusted basis reported on the              
          return, as a result of a claim of $41,700 in depreciation, was              
          $1,747,622, resulting in a reported gain of $252,378 on the sale            
          of the vessel.  Accepting petitioner’s claimed depreciation,                
          respondent nonetheless determined that petitioner’s adjusted                
          basis in the vessel at the time of sale was $1,132,503, or                  
          $615,119 less than claimed by petitioner, resulting in a                    
          determination of unreported gain in that amount.                            
               Later-Built Yachts                                                     
               Petitioner had four more yachts constructed by Marine                  
          Builders, Inc., in addition to the Wrecking Krew and Sir Winston            
          II at issue in this case.  Those later-built yachts were                    
          constructed pursuant to “cost-plus” contracts, whereas the                  
          Wrecking Krew and Sir Winston II were constructed pursuant to               
          fixed-price contracts.  Under the “cost-plus” contracts with                
          Marine Builders, Inc., petitioner supplied a greater portion of             







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011