- 9 - on those accounts that could have been for capital improvements to the Sir Winston did not exceed $79,347. During this period, petitioner also had two credit cards through which he made expenditures totaling $54,589. Petitioner sold the Sir Winston II to Dream Boat, Inc., for $2 million on April 7, 1997. Petitioner advised his return preparer, and reported on his 1997 return, that his basis in the Sir Winston II was $1,789,322. Adjusted basis reported on the return, as a result of a claim of $41,700 in depreciation, was $1,747,622, resulting in a reported gain of $252,378 on the sale of the vessel. Accepting petitioner’s claimed depreciation, respondent nonetheless determined that petitioner’s adjusted basis in the vessel at the time of sale was $1,132,503, or $615,119 less than claimed by petitioner, resulting in a determination of unreported gain in that amount. Later-Built Yachts Petitioner had four more yachts constructed by Marine Builders, Inc., in addition to the Wrecking Krew and Sir Winston II at issue in this case. Those later-built yachts were constructed pursuant to “cost-plus” contracts, whereas the Wrecking Krew and Sir Winston II were constructed pursuant to fixed-price contracts. Under the “cost-plus” contracts with Marine Builders, Inc., petitioner supplied a greater portion ofPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011