Ernest I. Korchak - Page 19

                                       - 19 -                                         
          and provided it to his tax return preparer, who did not question            
          the Schedule K-1 or the Madison investment when preparing                   
          petitioner’s return.  Petitioner reviewed and signed his Form               
          1040, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, for 1982, which was                
          filed with respondent on May 6, 1983.                                       
               On his 1982 return, petitioner reported gross income of                
          $317,784, which was derived from $567,723 of wages, dividends,              
          interest, and other income, a $24,961 loss from the bus rental              
          activity, a $30,010 loss from his Hilton Head rental activity,              
          $131,876 of losses from his oil and gas partnerships, and a                 
          $58,089 loss from Madison.  Petitioner also claimed a $116,492              
          investment credit, which consisted of a $59,835 regular                     
          investment credit and a $56,657 business energy investment                  
          credit, and he reported a $577,500 basis in the recyclers as                
          qualified investment property.  Due to his losses and credits,              
          petitioner’s tax was reduced to $3,198, and he reported an                  
          overpayment of $92,970.  Petitioner received a corresponding                
          refund.                                                                     
          Respondent’s Examination of Madison                                         
               On or about February 19, 1985, respondent issued to Mr.                
          Roberts, as Madison’s tax matters partner, a Notice of the                  
          Beginning of an Administrative Proceeding at the Partnership                
          Level With Respect to Partnership Items (NBAP), which stated that           
          the IRS was commencing an examination of partnership items                  






Page:  Previous  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011