- 2 - by levy of petitioner’s income tax liability for 2000. We sustain respondent’s determination for reasons discussed below. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Petitioner Petitioner resided in Florida when he filed his petition. Petitioner was a professional pilot in 2000 and had the following amounts of income: Payor Amount Description Bombardier Aerospace Corp. $68,305 Nonemployee compensation Bombardier Aerospace Corp 58,045 Wages PE Corp. NY 1,333 Nonemployee compensation Florida Agency for Workforce 825 Unemployment compensation Innovation Natl. Financial Services LLC 362 Dividends Bank of America 281 Interest Space Coast Credit UN 145 Interest First National Bank of Suffield 140 Interest Total 129,436 2. Petitioner’s Form 1040 for 2000 On August 17, 2001, petitioner submitted a Form 1040, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, for 2000 to respondent. In it, he stated that his filing status was married filing separately. He entered zeros on the lines provided for reporting his income and tax and requested a refund of $9,316. Petitioner attached to the Form 1040 a document in which he claimed, inter alia, that: (a) No section of the Internal Revenue Code makes him liable for income tax; (b) no section of the Internal Revenue Code requiresPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011