Gerald W. Kozack - Page 5

                                        - 5 -                                         
               On April 20, 2004, respondent’s Appeals Office sent                    
          petitioner a copy of Form 4340, Certificate of Assessments,                 
          Payments and Other Specified Matters, for 2000 and told him that:           
          (a) Petitioner could not challenge his underlying tax liability             
          as determined by respondent because he had previously been given            
          the opportunity to dispute it, and (b) the Appeals Office does              
          not consider challenges based on constitutional, religious,                 
          political, or moral grounds.                                                
               On June 2, 2004, Settlement Officer Joe M. Breazeale                   
          (Breazeale) reviewed respondent’s administrative file and                   
          telephoned petitioner.  Petitioner requested a face-to-face                 
          hearing.  Breazeale told petitioner that he would not offer him a           
          face-to-face hearing unless he had nonfrivolous issues to                   
          discuss.  In a telephone call on June 10, 2004, Breazeale told              
          petitioner that petitioner could not challenge his underlying tax           
          liability because he had received the notice of deficiency and              
          failed to petition the Tax Court.  Breazeale and petitioner also            
          discussed the process for an offer-in-compromise.  Petitioner               
          told Breazeale he would call him on June 18, 2004, and tell him             
          how he wanted to proceed.  Petitioner did not contact Breazeale             
          on June 18, 2004, or thereafter.                                            








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011