- 9 -
esting in the Miller decision that the Judge recognizes
“. . . their claim was cognizable under the Religious
Freedom Restoration Act . . .” So without having to
get into a long discussion of why I don’t want to get
my children into that fraudulent system at least my
right to stay out is confirmed. This same Judge goes
on to support the IRS’s need for the TIN (not the SSN)
for it’s work. If the SSN, which is provided by the
Social Security Administration were the only number
available I’d say you had me over a barrel, but since
the IRS also issues TIN’s there remains an option. I
saw at least six TIN categories listed on the IRS
website. I saw none that seemed to fit my requirements
but once the IRS offers the first alternative to a SSN
the 14th Amendment kicks in and protects my right to
chose that option. Therefore I picked the form that
seemed closest to my needs and have included it for
your submission. As a representative of the IRS you
should be able to expedite the issuance of these num-
bers and thus get this issue off the courts table.
Please let me know if a different form or original
documents are needed.
Petitioner provided to respondent’s counsel with peti-
tioner’s March 1, 2005 letter two altered Forms W-7, Application
for IRS Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (Form W-7),
that petitioner had prepared on behalf of his sons Caleb and
Joshua, respectively. At all relevant times, Form W-7 was to be
used “by individuals who are not U.S. citizens or permanent
residents.” The alterations that petitioner made to those
respective Forms W-7 included crossing out (1) the word “Individ-
ual” in the name of that form and (2) the word “foreign” that
appeared in that form where the applicant was to provide such
applicant’s “foreign address”.
On March 31, 2005, respondent’s counsel sent a letter
(respondent’s counsel’s March 31, 2005 letter) to petitioner with
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011