Joan Phyllis Levy - Page 40

                                       - 40 -                                         
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2004-190.16  Here, the unpaid 1991                 
          through 1999 tax liabilities enabled Levy to pay the college                
          tuitions of the three children and still maintain petitioner’s              
          and his normal standard of living.  These payments that he made             
          for the children’s college educations were significant.  We                 
          conclude that petitioner significantly benefited from the unpaid            
          1991 through 1999 tax liabilities.  See Alt v. Commissioner,                
          supra; Jonson v. Commissioner, supra.                                       
               This factor weighs against granting petitioner relief.                 
               6.  Compliance Factor                                                  
               Section 4.03(2)(e) of Rev. Proc. 2000-15, 2000-1 C.B. at               
          449, provides that the requesting spouse’s failure to make a good           
          faith effort to comply with Federal income tax laws in tax years            
          following the tax years for which relief is sought is a factor              
          weighing against relief.  Respondent contends that petitioner in            
          multiple instances did not comply with Federal income tax law               
          requirements for her 2000 through 2002 taxable years.  Respondent           
          notes:  (1) Petitioner filed her Form 1040 for 2000 (for which              
          she used a filing status of married filing separate) on October             
          21, 2002, approximately 1 year late; (2) petitioner paid the tax            
          she owed for 2000 on December 4, 2002, about 20 months after it             
          was due; (3) she paid the tax she owed for 2001 on December 4,              

               16 The equitable factors we consider under sec. 6015(f) are            
          the same equitable factors we consider under sec. 6015(b)(1)(D).            
          Ewing v. Commissioner, 122 T.C. 32, 48-49 n.15 (2004).                      





Page:  Previous  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011