Francis N. and Patricia A. Leonard - Page 3

                                        - 2 -                                         
               Respondent determined a deficiency of $25,746, and a section           
          6662(a) accuracy-related penalty of $2,412, with respect to                 
          petitioners’ 2000 Federal income tax.                                       
               The issues for decision are:  (1) Whether petitioners are              
          liable for the 10-percent additional tax imposed by section 72(t)           
          with respect to a distribution from a qualified retirement plan,            
          (2) whether petitioners are entitled to a casualty loss deduction           
          not claimed on their 2000 joint Federal income tax return, and              
          (3) whether petitioners are liable for an accuracy-related                  
          penalty under section 6662(a).                                              
          Background                                                                  
               Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.               
          Petitioners are, and were at all times relevant, married to each            
          other.  At the time the petition was filed, they resided in                 
          Midlothian, Illinois.  References to petitioner are to Francis N.           
          Leonard.                                                                    
               In 1978, petitioners purchased a house which had been built            
          about 1905.  Petitioners had a deck built on the back of the                
          house in 1995 at a cost of approximately $7,000.  The deck was              
          attached, in part, to the siding on the backside of petitioners’            
          house.  The deck was insured by petitioners’ homeowner’s policy             
          with Illinois Farmers Insurance Company (Farmers Insurance) at a            
          value of $9,000.                                                            







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011