Francis N. and Patricia A. Leonard - Page 4

                                        - 3 -                                         
               In August 2000, the deck collapsed during a graduation party           
          for petitioners’ son.  In addition to the damage to the deck,               
          some siding on the back of petitioners’ house was damaged.                  
               Petitioners submitted a claim of $18,035 with Farmers                  
          Insurance for the damage caused by the collapsed deck.  The                 
          insurance claim included the replacement cost of $6,500 for a               
          smaller deck and the replacement cost of $3,500 for siding on               
          petitioners’ house.  After inspection, Farmers Insurance                    
          determined that the damage to the deck and the siding on                    
          petitioners’ house was due to “wear and tear and deterioration,             
          wet rot and dry rot.”  Petitioners’ insurance claim was denied              
          because their insurance policy specifically denied coverage for             
          losses due to “wear and tear, marring, deterioration”, as well as           
          “rust, mold, wet or dry rot”.                                               
               After the denial of petitioners’ claim, petitioners filed a            
          claim with the State of Illinois Department of Insurance                    
          (Department of Insurance).  In a letter from the Department of              
          Insurance, petitioners were likewise notified:                              
               All insurance policies contain language that excludes                  
               any kind of rot or deterioration.  For your policy to                  
               provide coverage for the collapse of your deck, you                    
               will need to provide some type of proof or evidence                    
               that it was not rot whether it be wet or dry rot that                  
               caused the collapse.  Also be advised that if it was                   
               improper construction, that also is not covered by an                  
               insurance policy.                                                      
               During 2000, petitioners rebuilt a smaller deck and made               
          major repairs to their house, including repairs to the siding on            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011