Lisa Beth Levine - Page 24

                                       - 24 -                                         
          processor of crab meat depended upon crab meat pickers;                     
          therefore, crab meat pickers’ services were integral part of                
          processor’s business); Air Terminal Cab, Inc. v. United States,             
          478 F.2d at 581 (taxicab drivers were performing personal                   
          services constituting integral part of taxpayer’s business                  
          operations).  This factor favors respondent.                                
               5.   Opportunity for Profit or Loss                                    
               If a person performing a service has an opportunity to                 
          profit depending on his management skill, he may be an                      
          independent contractor.  United States v. Silk, 331 U.S. 704,               
          717-718 (1947).  If a person performing a service undertakes a              
          substantial cost, for example by employing and paying his own               
          laborers, he may be an independent contractor.  Id.  Petitioner             
          had no opportunity for profit or loss.  The amount of pay she               
          received depended only upon the number of hours she worked.                 
          While petitioner was given a project to complete, the amount she            
          would earn did not depend upon completion of the project.  This             
          factor favors respondent.                                                   
               6.   Termination of Relationship                                       
               In determining whether an employer-employee relationship               
          exists, courts consider the manner in which the work relationship           
          can be terminated; i.e., by one or both parties, at any time,               
          with or without notice or explanation.  Horner v. Acosta, 803               
          F.2d at 693; Spirides v. Reinhardt, 613 F.2d at 832; Ewens &                






Page:  Previous  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011