Jesse M. and Lura L. Lewis - Page 31

                                       - 31 -                                         
          constituted a substantial underpayment for which additional                 
          interest would be charged pursuant to section 6621(c).  On June             
          23, 1993, the Court entered the decisions in petitioners’ three             
          dockets.  On September 22, 1993, the decisions became final under           
          section 7481.  Petitioners subsequently paid in full the                    
          liabilities assessed in accordance with those decisions.                    
               Initial Appellate Proceedings                                          
               In the meantime, the appeals by test case petitioners                  
          represented by Mr. Izen were going forward.  On June 14, 1994,              
          the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit vacated the decisions            
          in the remaining test cases on the ground that the misconduct of            
          Messrs. Sims and McWade required further inquiry.  In a per                 
          curiam opinion, it observed:  “We cannot determine from the                 
          record whether the extent of misconduct rises to the level of a             
          structural defect voiding the judgment as fundamentally unfair,             
          or whether, despite the government’s misconduct, the judgment can           
          be upheld as harmless error.”  DuFresne v. Commissioner, 26 F.3d            
          105, 107 (9th Cir. 1994) (hereafter DuFresne).  Accordingly, the            
          Court of Appeals remanded the remaining test cases to this Court            
          with directions “to conduct an evidentiary hearing to determine             
          the full extent of the admitted wrong done by the government                
          trial lawyers.”  Id.  It further directed this Court to “consider           
          on the merits all motions of intervention filed by parties                  
          affected by this case.”  Id.                                                






Page:  Previous  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011