- 14 -
factors is not intended to be exhaustive. See Washington v.
Commissioner, 120 T.C. at 148; Jonson v. Commissioner, 118 T.C.
at 125.
Rev. Proc. 2000-15, sec. 4.03(1) lists the following six
positive factors that the Commissioner will weigh in favor of
granting equitable relief:
(a) Marital status. The requesting spouse is
separated * * * or divorced from the nonrequesting
spouse.
(b) Economic hardship. The requesting spouse
would suffer economic hardship (within the meaning of
section 4.02(1)(c) of this revenue procedure) if relief
from the liability is not granted.
(c) Abuse. The requesting spouse was abused by
the nonrequesting spouse, but such abuse did not amount
to duress.
(d) No knowledge or reason to know. In the case
of a liability that was properly reported but not paid,
the requesting spouse did not know and had no reason to
know that the liability would not be paid. * * *
(e) Nonrequesting spouse’s legal obligation. The
nonrequesting spouse has a legal obligation pursuant to
a divorce decree or agreement to pay the outstanding
liability. This will not be a factor weighing in favor
of relief if the requesting spouse knew or had reason
to know, at the time the divorce decree or agreement
was entered into, that the nonrequesting spouse would
not pay the liability.
(f) Attributable to nonrequesting spouse. The
liability for which relief is sought is solely
attributable to the nonrequesting spouse.
Rev. Proc. 2000-15, sec. 4.03(2) lists the following six negative
factors that the Commissioner weighs against granting equitable
relief:
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011