- 17 - failed to establish she will suffer economic hardship if she is not granted equitable relief. This positive factor does not apply. c. Abuse by Nonrequesting Spouse Petitioner does not allege that Mr. Cowdery abused her. This positive factor does not apply. Ewing v. Commissioner, supra at 46; Washington v. Commissioner, supra at 149. d. No Knowledge or Reason To Know For the reasons stated in our analysis of this factor under Rev. Proc. 2000-15, sec. 4.02, we conclude petitioner has failed to establish that she did not have reason to know when the returns were filed that the tax liabilities shown as due on the 1992, 1993, 1994, and 1995 returns would not be paid. This positive factor does not apply. e. Nonrequesting Spouse’s Legal Obligation Under petitioner and Mr. Cowdery’s 1997 divorce decree, Mr. Cowdery bears the legal obligation for paying the tax liabilities for each of the years in issue. Respondent concedes this factor weighs in favor of granting relief. f. Liabilities Solely Attributable to Nonrequesting Spouse The unpaid tax liabilities resulted from underwithholding of both petitioner’s and Mr. Cowdery’s wages, and, therefore, the liabilities are not solely attributable to Mr. Cowdery. Consequently, we conclude this positive factor does not apply.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011