Harry E. Mathews - Page 11

                                       - 11 -                                         
             on the basis of the record of this case, we find that there              
             is no genuine issue as to any material fact, and that a                  
             decision may be rendered for respondent as a matter of law.              
                  It is necessary to give petitioner a word of warning.               
             The Court considers petitioner’s position in this case to                
             be frivolous or groundless.  It also appears that he has                 
             instituted or maintained these proceedings primarily for                 
             delay.  Section 6673(a) authorizes the Court to require                  
             a taxpayer to pay to the United States a penalty not in                  
             excess of $25,000 whenever it appears to the Court that:                 
             (a) Proceedings before it have been instituted or                        
             maintained by the taxpayer primarily for delay; (b) the                  
             taxpayer’s position in such proceeding is frivolous or                   
             groundless; or (c) the taxpayer unreasonably failed to                   
             pursue available administrative remedies.  Sec. 6673(a)(1).              
             Petitioner is hereby warned that the Court will not                      
             hesitate to impose a penalty under section 6673(a) against               
             him in any appropriate case in the future.                               
















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011