John E. and Vicki D. Morrissey - Page 20

                                        -19-                                          
               9.   Whether Elements of Personal Pleasure or Recreation Are           
                    Involved                                                          
               We next examine whether elements of personal pleasure or               
          recreation were involved in the activity.  The presence of                  
          recreational or pleasurable motives in conducting an activity may           
          indicate that the taxpayer is not conducting the activity for               
          profit.  Sec. 1.183-2(b)(9), Income Tax Regs.  The fact that the            
          taxpayer derives personal pleasure from engaging in the activity            
          is not sufficient to cause the activity to be classified as not             
          engaged in for profit, however, if the activity is, in fact,                
          conducted for profit as shown by other factors.  Jackson v.                 
          Commissioner, supra; sec. 1.183-2(b)(9), Income Tax Regs.                   
               Petitioner has been interested in cars throughout his life             
          and obviously enjoys drag racing.  Petitioner also testified,               
          however, that there were aspects of the activity that he did not            
          enjoy, including the heat on the track and the multiple layers of           
          protective clothing he was required to wear.  Petitioner further            
          emphasized that, when he was unable to produce a profit from the            
          activity, he stopped the activity.  He testified that he did not            
          enjoy it enough to continue without the possibility of financial            
          gain.  Although petitioner may have derived some pleasure from              
          the drag racing activity, this factor does not outweigh the other           
          factors indicating that petitioner engaged in the drag racing               
          activity for profit.                                                        
               10. Conclusion                                                         
               Considering all of the facts and circumstances of this case,           
          we find that petitioner has proved that he engaged in the drag              




Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011