- 5 - Respondent determined that various expenses were not substantiated, were not shown to be ordinary and necessary to petitioner’s business, or were personal in nature and therefore not deductible. Discussion Section 162 allows a deduction for all ordinary and necessary expenses incurred in carrying on a trade or business if the taxpayer maintains records or other proof sufficient to substantiate the expenses.7 Secs. 162(a), 6001; sec. 1.6001- 1(a), Income Tax Regs. To be engaged in a trade or business the taxpayer must be involved in the activity with continuity and regularity and the taxpayer's primary purpose for engaging in the activity must be for income or profit. Sec. 162; see Commissioner v. Groetzinger, 480 U.S. 23, 35 (1987); Antonides v. Commissioner, 893 F.2d 656, 659 (4th Cir. 1990), affg. 91 T.C. 686 (1988). Renaissance has been found to be an illegal pyramid scheme that offered no product or service other than the dissemination of fraudulent tax advice. The parties have stipulated the deductions claimed with regard to the Renaissance activity; however, respondent contends that the Renaissance activity was not a trade or business. 7 Sec. 7491(a), concerning burden of proof, is not applicable here because petitioners have not satisfied the substantiation requirements. Sec. 7491(a)(2)(A).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011