- 2 -
Petitioner resided in Kennewick, Washington, when her petition in
this case was filed.
On May 10, 2004, we filed the parties’ stipulation of
settlement and petitioner’s motion. On August 5, 2004, we filed
respondent’s response to petitioner’s motion. On September 15,
2004, we filed petitioner’s reply to respondent’s response and an
additional declaration in support of the reply. On December 6,
2004, we ordered petitioner to submit an additional declaration
and supporting documentation to support the reasonableness of the
costs claimed. On January 10, 2005, we received and filed
petitioner’s supplemental declaration, and on January 28, 2005,
we received and filed respondent’s supplemental response to
petitioner’s supplemental declaration.
Neither party requested a hearing, and after reviewing the
relevant documents, we have concluded that a hearing on the
motion is not necessary. See Rule 232(a)(2). In disposing of
this motion, we rely on the parties’ filings and attached
exhibits.
Background
In 1986, petitioner and her husband, Melvin L. Owen,
invested in a partnership called Timeshare Breeding Service 1985-
4, Ltd., also referred to as Durham Genetics Engineering 1985-4,
1(...continued)
Practice and Procedure.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011