Barbara A. Owen - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         
          Ltd. (hereinafter DGE), which had been organized, promoted, and             
          operated by Walter J. Hoyt III.2  Petitioner and Mr. Owen held              
          partnership interests either jointly or as tenants in common in             
          three separate “series” of DGE partnership units.  Petitioner               
          wrote and signed numerous checks payable to DGE or the Hoyt                 
          organization from her and Mr. Owen’s joint bank account and wrote           
          and signed several other checks drawn on her own account to                 
          maintain their investment in DGE.  DGE issued Schedules K-1,                
          Partner’s Share of Income, Credits, Deductions, etc., for 1987 to           
          1995, which reflected that both petitioner and Mr. Owen were                
          partners in DGE.  In addition, in 1992, petitioner and Mr. Owen             
          signed a Power of Attorney and Debt Assumption Agreement in which           



               2Walter J. Hoyt III also organized, promoted, operated, and            
          served as the general partner of more than 100 livestock breeding           
          limited partnerships from 1971 through 1998.  See, e.g., River              
          City Ranches #1, Ltd. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2003-150, affd.           
          in part, revd. in part and remanded 401 F.3d 1136 (9th Cir.                 
          2005).  In general, the Hoyt partnerships purchased livestock               
          from related Hoyt entities for no money down and a promissory               
          note.  See, e.g., Durham Farms #1, J.V. v. Commissioner, T.C.               
          Memo. 2000-159, affd. 59 Fed. Appx. 952 (9th Cir. 2003);                    
          Shorthorn Genetic Engg. 1982-2, Ltd. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo.            
          1996-515.  The investors in the Hoyt partnerships assumed                   
          personal liability for the partnerships’ promissory notes, made             
          payments on the notes to the Hoyt partnerships, see, e.g.,                  
          Shorthorn Genetic Engg. 1982-2, Ltd. v. Commissioner, supra, and,           
          in return, deducted large partnership losses related to the                 
          purchase, management, and sale of livestock, see River City                 
          Ranches #1, Ltd. v. Commissioner, supra; Mekulsia v.                        
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2003-138, affd. 389 F.3d 601 (6th Cir.             
          2004); Durham Farms #1, J.V. v. Commissioner, supra; Shorthorn              
          Genetic Engg. 1982-2, Ltd. v. Commissioner, supra; Bales v.                 
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1989-568.                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011