Vernadean A. Pates - Page 6

                                        - 5 -                                         
          payments) on account of personal physical injuries or physical              
          sickness”.  Section 1.104-1(c), Income Tax Regs., defines                   
          “damages received” as “an amount received (other than workmen’s             
          compensation) through prosecution of a legal suit or action based           
          upon tort or tort type rights, or through a settlement agreement            
          entered into in lieu of such prosecution.”  Amounts are                     
          excludable from gross income only when (1) the underlying cause             
          of action giving rise to the recovery is based on tort or tort              
          type rights, and (2) the damages are received on account of                 
          personal injuries or sickness.  Commissioner v. Schleier, 515               
          U.S. 323, 337 (1995).  The flush language in section 104(a)                 
          further provides that “emotional distress shall not be treated as           
          a physical injury or physical sickness.”  Sec. 104.                         
               Where amounts are received pursuant to a settlement                    
          agreement, the nature of the claim that was the actual basis for            
          settlement controls whether such amounts are excludable from                
          income under section 104(a)(2).  United States v. Burke, 504 U.S.           
          229, 237 (1992).  Determination of the nature of the claim is a             
          factual inquiry and is generally made by reference to the                   
          settlement agreement.  Robinson v. Commissioner, 102 T.C. 116,              
          126 (1994), affd. in part and revd. in part 70 F.3d 34 (5th Cir.            
          1995).  “[W]here an amount is paid in settlement of a case, the             
          critical question is, in lieu of what was the settlement amount             
          paid.”  Bagley v. Commissioner, 105 T.C. 396, 406 (1995), affd.             






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011