Jacob R. Ramsburg, Jr. and Norma J. Ramsburg - Page 32

                                        - 32 -                                         
          we find that petitioners have failed to carry their burden of                
          establishing that Mr. Ramsburg purchased from Kildare Timmy on               
          January 1, 1998, its racing and breeding horses and stud rights.             
          On that record, we further find that petitioners have failed to              
          carry their burden of establishing that Mr. Ramsburg received                
          only money from Kildare Timmy in liquidation of his interest in              
          that partnership.  On the record before us, we find that on                  
          January 1, 1998, Kildare Timmy distributed to Mr. Ramsburg in                
          liquidation of his interest in that partnership not only money               
          (i.e., the Kildare Timmy bank account balance) but also its                  
          racing and breeding horses and stud rights.26                                

               26On the record before us, we also find that petitioners                
          have failed to carry their burden of establishing that on Jan. 1,            
          1998, Mr. Stottlemeyer “effectively received [from Kildare                   
          Timmy], in liquidation of the partnership, a credit equal to his             
          50% share of the assets of the partnership against his liability             
          to Mr. Ramsburg [under Mr. Stottlemeyer’s note] in the amount of             
          $146,750.”  In addition, Mr. Stottlemeyer’s note that he signed              
          on Dec. 31, 1994, provided that Mr. Stottlemeyer promised to pay             
          to Mr. Ramsburg the “lesser of my [Mr. Stottlemeyer’s] share of              
          cash proceeds from [the] disposition of horses owned by the                  
          entity known as Kildare Timmy or the sum of one hundred fourty               
          [sic] six thousand seven hundred and fifty Dollars * * * with                
          interest * * * at the rate of 0% per annum.”  Mr. Stottlemeyer’s             
          note did not specify any date(s) on which Mr. Stottlemeyer was to            
          make any payment(s) thereunder.  On the record before us, we find            
          that petitioners have failed to carry their burden of establish-             
          ing that there was a loan by Mr. Ramsburg to Mr. Stottlemeyer                
          that was evidenced by Mr. Stottlemeyer’s note.  See, e.g., Haag              
          v. Commissioner, 88 T.C. 604, 616 n.6 (1987), affd. without                  
          published opinion 855 F.2d 855 (8th Cir. 1988).  Assuming                    
          arguendo that petitioners had carried their burden of establish-             
          ing that there was a loan by Mr. Ramsburg to Mr. Stottlemeyer                
          that was evidenced by Mr. Stottlemeyer’s note, we have found that            
          there was no sale by Kildare Timmy to Mr. Ramsburg of its horses             
          and stud rights.  As a result, there were no “cash proceeds from             
                                                              (continued...)           




Page:  Previous  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011