- 11 -
On February 5, 2004, an order with respect to a petition for
rule to show cause was entered by the circuit court.2 The order
provides, in pertinent part:
That this Matter coming on to be heard on the Petition
for Rule to Show Cause previously entered against GERALYN M.
RANDICH on January 8, 2004, for failure to include
unallocated support on her 2000 tax return as ordered in the
judgment for dissolution of marriage; Petitioner [Mr.
Randich] present and represented by counsel and respondent
Geralyn M. Randich appearing pro se:
The Court finds:
1. That GERALYN M. RANDICH is found to be in indirect
civil contempt for failure to characterize the unallocated
support as maintenance on her 2000 Federal and State tax
return, as ordered by the Court on April 12, 2000, in the
judgment for dissolution of marriage.
2. That GERALYN M. RANDICH shall have the opportunity
to purge herself from contempt by filing an appropriate
amended Federal and State tax return for 2000 properly
characterizing the payments received in 2000 as maintenance
or unallocated support.
3. That sentencing is stayed for 60 days pending the
filing of the amended 2000 Federal and State tax returns.
2Ms. Randich objects to this document’s being entered into
evidence on the grounds of relevance, in that the information
contained therein is not related to the matter at issue, is
unfair and prejudicial, and promotes confusion of the matter at
issue. A ruling on Ms. Randich’s objection was delayed for
consideration. This document will be received into evidence
subject to Ms. Randich’s objection noted in the record.
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 NextLast modified: May 25, 2011