- 12 -
On April 5, 2004, an order with respect to a petition for
rule for contempt of court was entered by the circuit court.3
The order provides, in pertinent part:
This Matter coming on to be heard on the Petition for
Rule for Contempt of Court previously entered against
Geralyn Randich on February 5, 2004, and the purge of that
contempt; Geralyn Randich appearing in open Court and
producing her amended 2000 Federal and State Income Tax
Return filed with the Internal Revenue Service on March 27,
2004, the Court being fully advised in the matter:
It is Hereby Ordered:
1. That Geralyn Randich having filed the Amended 2000
Federal and State Tax Return the contempt of Court
previously entered is hereby held for naught.
2. That Geralyn Randich is Ordered to pay $750 as and
for attorney’s fees to Theresa M. Malysa in monthly
installments as follows: May 1, 2004, $150 to be paid and
thereafter on the first day of the month $100 until the
balance is paid in full; and judgment is entered against
Geralyn Randich in said amount.
On April 15, 2001, Ms. Randich timely filed her Federal
income tax return for taxable year 2000. On her return, Ms.
Randich did not report as income the $28,800 in payments made to
her by Mr. Randich pursuant to the judgment for dissolution of
marriage in petitioners’ divorce because she considered the full
amount to be nontaxable child support.
3Ms. Randich objects to this document’s being entered into
evidence on the grounds of relevance, in that the information
contained therein is not related to the matter at issue, is
unfair and prejudicial, and promotes confusion of the matter at
issue. A ruling on Ms. Randich’s objection was delayed for
consideration. This document will be received into evidence
subject to Ms. Randich’s objection noted in the record.
Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 NextLast modified: May 25, 2011