Bill Remos - Page 11

                                       - 10 -                                         
          Court acknowledges that petitioner most likely had some gambling            
          losses during the year, we are unable to determine (either with             
          specificity or by estimation) the amount of those losses on the             
          basis of the record at hand.  We conclude that petitioner has               
          failed to satisfy his burden of proof on this issue.  See Mayer             
          v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2000-295, affd. 29 Fed. Appx. 706 (2d           
          Cir. 2002); see also Zielonka v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1997-             
          81.  Therefore, we are unable to allow any deduction for gambling           
          losses.                                                                     
               Reviewed and adopted as the report of the Small Tax Case               
          Division.                                                                   

                                             Decision will be entered                 
                                        for respondent.                               























Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  

Last modified: May 25, 2011