Russell B. Ritchie - Page 4

                                        - 3 -                                         
          unscheduled business mileage.  Stores reimbursed petitioner for             
          certain expenses during the year 2002.  Petitioner left the                 
          company in November of 2002.                                                
               Petitioner had a personal cell phone during 2002 that he               
          also used for business calls.  Petitioner paid a flat rate, no              
          matter how many phone calls were made on the phone.                         
               On petitioner’s Schedule A, Itemized Deductions, attached to           
          his Federal income tax return for 2002, petitioner deducted                 
          unreimbursed employee business expenses of $13,980, tax                     
          preparation fees of $550, and charitable contributions of $1,755,           
          of which $1,260 was listed as being made by cash or check.                  
          Respondent disallowed all of the deductions for lack of                     
          substantiation.                                                             
               The unreimbursed business expenses deducted by petitioner              
          included a “Uniforms” expense deduction of $850.  As petitioner             
          presented no argument or evidence on the issues of uniform                  
          expenses and tax preparation fees, he is deemed to have conceded            
          them.  See Rule 34(b)(4); Rybak v. Commissioner, 91 T.C. 524, 566           
          n.19 (1988).                                                                
                                     Discussion                                       
               Petitioner has made no argument that the burden of proof               
          shifting provisions of section 7491(a)(1) apply to this case, nor           
          has he offered any evidence that he has complied with the                   
          requirements of section 7491(a)(2).  The burden of proof in this            






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011