- 7 - situations requiring transportation expenses for which Stores would not have reimbursed him. He alleged that his transportation expense deduction was related to the unscheduled “emergency” trips. Petitioner’s evidence on the issue consisted of Stores’ check stubs showing reimbursements to him of $1,550, presumably for scheduled trips, and a computer-generated monthly log titled “Mileage - Tax Year 2002”, purporting to show cumulative monthly mileage to “county locations” in 2002. It is interesting to note that the same three counties, Orange, “LA”, and San Diego, as well as “miscellaneous mileage” are listed every month. The total mileage traveled each month is also fairly consistent. According to petitioner’s evidence, his “emergency” unscheduled transportation expenses were a startling 623 percent of his reimbursed expenses for scheduled trips. Further complicating matters for petitioner, the Court is unable to determine from his evidence which of his trips were reimbursed and which were not because his evidence does not meet the standard of section 274(d). Respondent’s determination on this issue is sustained. Other Expenses Petitioner claimed $1,245 of “other” business expenses. The Court presumes that the Verizon Wireless cell phone bills and miscellaneous receipts offered by petitioner were submitted asPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011